Extract: APPENDIX VIII – SECRET SOCIETIES BY NESTA WEBSTER
Proposed Strategies (extracts) from the Protocols of Zion
The propagation of ideas of all possible complexions with the task of undermining established forms of order, including Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism, Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Materialism, Feminism and Utopianism.
Staging catastrophes against one’s own people, then claiming a moral high ground for leverage as savior;
Curtailment of civil liberties with the excuse of defeating the enemies of peace Creating the impression of the existence of freedom of press, freedom of speech, democracy and human-rights, all of which are subsequently undermined and become mere illusions or deceptive smokescreens behind which actual oppression lies.
The destruction of Christianity, other religions and cultures, followed by a transitional stage of atheism, followed finally by the hegemony of Luciferian Judaism.
Undermining financial systems by foreign loans, creating national bankruptcy, destroying Money Markets and replacing them with government credit institutions.
Dissemination of Pornographic literature, Practice of Brainwashing, Inducement of Economic depressions, Employment of Universal Suffrage (democracy), Instigation of World Wars, Establishment of World Government;
Despite the fact that this document is also said to be a “proven” forgery by Zionist enthusiasts, all historical evidence indicates that the proposals:
Perhaps this fastidious Mao-like ‘leap forward’ in geo-political affairs is another evolutionary happens-chance and the alleged forged document is merely a precognitive lark! The sober scholar must ask however: “Do these phenomena constitute human conspiracy or a natural sequence of events? Insha’Allah, I will establish that the answer is ‘yes’ and ‘yes again’, as did Ibn Khaldun! What is worse is that many of their professional fools on retainer claim ‘guidance’ from ascended Masters, and that, like the good Nazis they truly are, they are following orders for the welfare and salvation of mankind. Touching, isn’t it?
On The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
… The Protocols do represent the program of world revolution, and that in view of their prophetic nature and of their extraordinary resemblance to the protocols of certain secret societies in the past, they were either the work of some such society or of someone profoundly versed in the lore of secret societies who was able to reproduce their ideas and phraseology… The so-called refutation of the Protocols which appeared in the Times of August 1922, tends to confirm this opinion. According to these articles the Protocols were largely copied from the book of Maurice Joly, Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, published in 1864. Let it be said at once that the resemblance between the two works could not be accidental, not only are whole paragraphs almost identical, but the various points in the programme follow each other in precisely the same order. But whether Nilus copied from Joly or from the same source whence Joly derived his ideas is another question. It will be noticed that Joly, in his preface, never claimed to have originated the scheme described in his book; on the contrary he distinctly states that it “personifies in particular a political system which has not varied for a single day in its application since the disastrous and alas! too far-off date of its enthronement.”… The sixties of the last century therefore mark an important era in the history of the secret societies, and it was right in the middle of this period that Maurice Joly published his book.
1860. Alliance Israëlite Universelle founded.
1864. 1st Internationale taken over by Karl Marx. “Alliance Sociale Démocratique of Bakunin founded (parallels).” Maurice Joly’s Dialogue aux Enfers published (parallels quoted by Times).
1866. 1st Congress of Internationale at Geneva.
1868. Goedsche’s Biarritz (parallels quoted by Mr. Lucien Wolf).
1869. Gougenot Des Mousseaux’s Le Juif, etc., “Bakunin’s Polémique contre les Juifs.
… at the moment when Maurice Joly wrote his Dialogues, the ideas they embodied were current in many different circles. It is interesting, moreover, to notice that the authors of the last two works referred to above, the Catholic and Royalist Des Mousseaux and the Anarchist Bakunin, between whom it is impossible to imagine any connexion, both in the same year denounced the growing power of the Jews whom Bakunin described as “the most formidable sect” in Europe, and again asserted that a leakage of information had taken place in the secret societies. Thus in 1870 Bakunin explains that his secret society has been broken up because its secrets have been given away, and that his colleague Netchaïeff has arrived at the conclusion that “in order to found a serious and indestructible society one must take for a basis the policy of Machiavelli.” Meanwhile Gougenot Des Mousseaux had related in Le Juif, that in December 1865 he had received a letter from a German statesman saying:
Since the revolutionary recrudescence of 1848, I have had relations with a Jew who, from vanity, betrayed the secret of the secret societies with which he had been associated, and who warned me eight or ten days beforehand of all the revolutions which were about to break out at any point of Europe. I owe to him the unshakeable conviction that all these movements of “oppressed peoples,” etc., etc., are devised by half a dozen individuals, who give their orders to the secret societies of all Europe. The ground is absolutely mined beneath our feet, and the Jews provide a large contingent of these miners….
… the Protocols are a vast improvement on the Dialogues of Joly. The most striking passages they contain are not to be found in the earlier work, nor, which is more remarkable, are several of the amazing prophecies concerning the future which time has realized … To sum up then, the Protocols are either a mere plagiarism of Maurice Joly’s work, in which case the prophetic passages added by Nilus or another remain unexplained [see addendum below – oz], or they are a revised edition of the plan communicated to Joly in 1864, brought up to date and supplemented so as to suit modern conditions by the continuers of the plot… It would be easier, however to absolve the Jews from all suspicion of complicity if they and their friends had adopted a more straightforward course from the time the Protocols appeared. When some years ago a work of the same kind was directed against the Jesuits, containing what purported to be a “Secret Plan” of revolution closely resembling the Protocols, the Jesuits indulged in no invectives, made no appeal that the book should be burnt by the common hangman, resorted to no fantastic explanations, but quietly pronounced the charge to be a fabrication. Thus the matter ended.
But from the moment the Protocols were published the Jews and their friends had recourse to every tortuous method of defense, brought pressure to bear on the publishers—succeeded, in fact, in temporarily stopping the sales—appealed to the Home Secretary to order their suppression, concocted one clinching refutation after another, all mutually exclusive of each other, so that by the time the solution now pronounced to be the correct one appeared, we had already been assured half a dozen times that the Protocols had been completely and finally refuted.
Addendum: The ‘explanation’ is provided in Occult Theocrasy by Lady Q. who sites Gould’s History of Freemasonry, vol. II and L. Fry’s Waters Flowing Eastward as sources. These authors cite a Jew named Joseph Schorst, as being responsible for abstracting the Protocols from the Lodge of Mizriam in Paris in 1884. Mr. Schorst’s father was a counterfeiter, and he himself was mysteriously murdered in Egypt. Mr. Fry notes that even before Joly’s book, another Jew, Jacob Venedy published Machiavelly, Montesqueu, Rousseau in Berlin, 1850. An extremely detailed account is given by Lady Q. [Vol. II pp. 407 to 420]. In summary, The trail of what became known as the Protocols is readily found by any who can read the ‘lay of the land’ as it were, and each campfire along the way was made by eminent Jewish fellows associated with and guiding the Secret Societies, most importantly, The Templar Lodges and Rites of Mizriam and Memphis and The Alliance Israelite Universelle. The main character who bridges the generation between Mr. Venedy to Schorst is the Jew, Adolphe Cremieux [and his confidential agent, Leon Gambetta]. Cremieux took a prominent part in the Damscus Affair [Hasidic Ritual Murder of a Catholic Priest, Father Thomas 1840]; the Foundation of the Israelite Universelle; the Lodge of Mizriam, Grand Orient and Scottish Rite, and Grand Master of the latter — not to mention his intrigues as agent and enemy for/of Napoleon III and Disraeli, the latter with whom he shared the financial support of Rothschild. Speaking to the General assembly of the Alliance Israelite Universelle in 1864 he said:
The trail of the Protocols distinctly leads to names like Fould, Rothschild, Montefiore, Disraeli, Goldsmith, Marx, Hess, Jacoby, Lassaille, Riesser as well — all Jews. Alfred Rosenberg, another Jew [pic above], conveniently sleuthed into the hands of Hitler’s Thule Society mentors under the auspice of Detriech Eckhart, another Jew and Roscicrucian Adept at Magick. Rosenberg became Hitler’s ideologue. The Illuminati goal with the Nazi ‘Final Solution’ was to exterminate all truly religious Jews. It’s actually quite simple to see once one accepts the profound depths of iniquity of which these people are capable. – omar zaid.
 James Guillaume, Documents de l’Internationale, I. 131.
 Correspondance de Bakounine, published by Michael Dragomanov, p. 325; Le Juif, etc., pp. 367, 368.
 Revolution and War or Britain’s Peril and her Secret Foes, by Vigilant (1913). A great portion of this book exposing the subtle propaganda of Socialism and Pacifism is admirable; it is only where the author attempts to lay all this to the charge of the Jesuits that he entirely fails to substantiate his case.