A Bayesian Analysis Proves That SARS-CoV-2 Is Laboratory Derived 


“The starting probability for origin of SARS-CoV-2 was set with the zoonotic or natural hypothesis at 98.8% likelihood with the laboratory origin hypothesis set at 1.2%. ” However, through a comprehensive and detailed Bayesian analysis of 26 publicly released evidence (including “furin cleavage site “, etc.), the conclusion is that the probability of the SARS-CoV-2 originating in the laboratory is as high as 99.8%, i.e. “beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived”.

THE SCIENCE PROVES THAT AUTHORITIES HAVE BEEN LYING TO US

A Bayesian Analysis Proves That SARS-CoV-2 Is Laboratory Derived | From the Trenches World Report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: