THEY LIED—not only that, but the WHO director is a gay fruitcake! ~oz
PCR tests “do not give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2,” Fuellmich said. “Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized,” he continued. “Instead, they are simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.” “Contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present,” Fuellmich emphasized. “If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they are infected with anything, let alone with a contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
Prof Michel Chossudovsky writes –
It is now confirmed beyond doubt that the test (PCR test) used to estimate COVID-19 positive cases is meaningless.
PCR- Positive does not imply Covid-19 Positive.
The statistics derived from the PCR test do not measure “confirmed cases”.
The PCR Test does not provide the statistics required (by policy-makers and national health authorities) to assess the number of people infected.
Because the PCR Test is faulty and invalid as a means of identifying the spread of the virus, which means that ALL MAJOR DECISIONS taken by the WHO and national governments since late January 2020 (supported by faulty statistics) are invalid.
READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.
“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.
TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
I’m so bloody fed up with stupid people in positions of authority I could S C R E A M ! ~ oz