THE ORIGINAL LINEAGE OF MALACCA RULERS ARE INDIAN


Editor’s Note: The best advice we can give anyone is to ‘stop lying’. I suggest that the Malays heed this before it is too late to save any face whatsoever from the entire UMNO debacle, which not only embarrasses Malays before the world but insults Islam as well. – oz
Politics | January 16, 2017 by | 0 Comments

THERE IS NO ‘KETUANAN MELAYU’ BECAUSE THE LINEAGE OF MELAKA SULTANS ARE INDIANS, NOT MALAYS. IN THE JAVANESE LANGUAGE, THE WORD “MELAYU” MEANS “A FUGITIVE”.

Steadyaku47 comment : This is an article on “True Malaysian History”. The author is not known to me.

Do we, as Malaysians, really know our country’s history? Or has it subverted to suit the idealogical needs of the Malay community?

For too long our government has systematically been wiping out any references to a famous Melaka prince as being Hindu and belonging to the powerful Sri Vijaya Hindu empire. Instead our chidren are being taught that Parameswara was a Malay prince.
What race ruled or did not rule is besides the point.What is important is not butchering history to create your own truths.

  • You cannot change your race even if you convert.

Parameswara could have been responsible for Umno’s stupid and false sense of heritage through ‘Ketuanan Melayu’. If this is what it is based on, there is no ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ because the lineage of Melaka Sultans are Indians, not Malays. It is no secret that Parameswara was an Indian and a Hindu prince. It is clear from records that Parameswara never converted to Islam. He was an Indian Hindu who fled Palembang in Sumatra to eventually found Melaka circa 1400 AD and start the entire Malaysian royalty. Malaysia ‘s royalty was and is of Hindu/India origin. On the other hand it was Sri Maharaja who converted himself and the court of Melaka to Islam, and as a result took on the name of Sultan Muhammad Shah sometime after 1435.

The most famous of Indian Hindu Kings were Rajaraja Chola and his son Rajendra Chola who invaded Southern Thailand, Kedah, Perak, Johor and Sumatra about 1000 AD. This is Raja-raja Chola – the Indian/Hindu kings and not Raja Chulan – a Malay king.
But what is really sad is that our children are taught as though Malaysian history suddenly began in 1400 with an Islamic Melaka. Even the Malays themselves are being cheated by UMNO into believing that everything started around 1400. We are also led to believe that the Indians and Chinese first arrived on the shores of Malaysia only in around 1850 as desperate indentured labourers, farmers and miners. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The cultural influences of India in particular and China, in South East Asia span over 2,000 years starting perhaps with the arrival from India of the Brahmanical prince/scholar – Aji Saka in Java in AD 78, through to Vietnam, Cambodia (Indo China), Thailand, Burma, Indonesia, Bali, Borneo, Brunei and beyond. Malay culture is Indian culture. In fact the whole of South East Asian culture is Indian culture.
The findings at Bujang Valley speak of an ancient Indian/Hindu presence in Kedah. There were Chinese settlements in Pahang and Kelantan around the 13th -14th century and in 12th century in Singapore The early Brunei Sultanate had a Chinese Queen. One need not ponder at length the implications of Angkor Wat and Borobudur or that 60% -70% of Bahasa Malaysia comprises Sanskrit/Tamil words. But ALL of these are hidden away from the rakyat including the Malays themselves so the Malays in particular grow up with limited knowledge of their own country and heritage.

To illustrate, some of these words are
bumi = boomi
putra = putran
raja = rajah
desa = thesam
syakti = sakthi
kolam = kulam
bahaya = abahya
jaya = jeya
maha = maha
aneka = aneha
nadi = naadi
kedai = kadai
mahligai = maaligai
mantra = manthrum
menteri = manteri

 

(This list can go on and it is true because Tamil and Sanskrit are about 5, 000 years old)

An extremely important archeological finding that pointed to one of the greatest empires in history – the Raja Cholan empire that ruled from the Maldives through India , Sri Lanka and right down to South East Asia found deep in the jungles of Johor a few years ago and made headlines in the mainstream newspapers in 2005, suddenly disappeared from the news. The time has arrived for us to record our history as the facts tell us and not as we would like to wish it for. The truth will never hurt anyone. Lies, always will.

– steadyaku-steadyaku-husseinhamid.blogspot.my

65 Comments on “THE ORIGINAL LINEAGE OF MALACCA RULERS ARE INDIAN

  1. Bullshit will always smells like bullshit even when raja raja chola’s name was invoked…

  2. Pingback: HISTORY – TAMIL / HINDUISM – myinfozon

  3. Pingback: HISTORY – TAMIL / HINDUISM – Myinfozon – The Malaysian Indian Database

  4. This article is a joke, there were no references at all, no pHD thesis supported. What a syok sendiri article. Bangga sgt dengan India nya, asal tak bangga sekali dengan Kasta sistem tu?

    All i see is Umno cheated, blalabla,, but history never cheats with back up evidences, strong evidence of DNA, archives. Come this machas syok sendiri, all want to claim, what an asshole.

    • Very enlightening! We are very fond of cherry picking history, then distorting the narrative!

  5. Pingback: HISTORY – TAMIL / HINDUISM – Myinfozon

  6. Did everyone know the meaning of Hindu endowment board? 1906 the board was formed by British… so where did British got this fund? Actually this private trust and British is admin for the vijanagara empire (the last Hindu empire) that’s y east India Company was formed in 1600 in south India.
    So if u think commenwelth country It’s a 127 country and did u think it’s belong to who?
    2018 end of 2nd term 99 years lease,
    Everything is coming back to monarch system , end of illuminati.

  7. Parameswara is an hindu. No doubt about it. The malay is the mix of orang laut and some of the is bugis pirate that settle down and become farmer and turn good. No more pirate life style.
    Sri vijaya comes first.and stay here ling time ago.raja raja chola bring their gold kerongsang and gold deco to wear .and the malay follow them.. but now they turn to arab attire and believes.

    • Truth will allways prevail. It is with great pride and respect I give to those who live by the truth.It is by truth that we get respect from people and nations. It is high time that those concerned with history re write the truth before they get buried for dishonesty and that makes history

  8. The above is not totally true…Parameswara was not a prince but a cold blooded murderer, crook and pirate. True, he was Hindu.
    The Siamese kingdom were guardians and protectors of the straits of Malacca from piratesand that’s why they paid protection money to the Chinese, to protect them for the Siamese. Rajendra Raja Chola was the crown Prince who concurred and ruled Kedah or Kadaram. He also named Malaysia / Malaya – Malai which means mountains and Ur which means land.
    If Parameswara really founded Malacca how is it that in ancient world maps the word Malacoos is dated way before 1400s. I was curious and, read the history of Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, India etc.. I was shocked to discover that umno had been lying and conning us….

    • UMNO IS A BROTHERHOOD OF POSERS (liars and hypocrites) — as made evident to the entire world now — and if I’m not mistaken, Mahathir, in Hindu, means chief thief . . . and moreover, most dynasty the world over are rooted in some form of piracy, it is the way of Cain . . .

    • They are true politician always try to con people for the benefits of partially population. The saddest is that non of the educationists willing to talk the truth and being control. From the right beginning they starts plant venom on people & make people as their weapons….

  9. We shud get JPN to categorize our origin thru a DNA Test. This will put the matter to rest once and for all. Why the pretense.

  10. Thanks for the truth, it’s the truth. Nobody can hide the truth. Always learn the real history before saying wrong things on Indians.

  11. Pingback: Indians in Malaya are Malay if they comply with Definition of Malay in Article 160 – FernzTheGreat

  12. Economic migration and trade has driven the world for time immemorial. It doesn’t matter where we come from. We are all human with the choice of using our intelligence to do great good or harm. Let’s hope good prevails.

  13. That is true. I studied that in Primary Schools back in 1950-60s. In actual fact, there is no lineage to history about present M. We studied about the 3 main tribes as ingenious people of Malaya. They are the real Bumiputra. We the rest are all occupancy residence. Just like US, the Red Indians,Tomahawk, etc, are the BPutra while the presence US citizens are Occupancy Residence.

  14. No one disputes that Parameswara was a Hindu Prince, but to say that he was Indian is a huge stretch.

    Religion and race are not the same thing. Can we say that the Bactrian nation once ruled China because Buddha was a Bactrian Prince? Or that Filipinos are Jewish because we find Christian buildings in their country?

    Any evidence of Hinduism does not equate to Indian rulers.

    Tamil and Sanskrit are also not the same language. Sanskrit is the root of many languages across the world. It is related to Greek and Latin, as well as Hittite, Luwian, Old Avestan and many other extinct languages with historical significance to Europe, and Asia.

    So the similarity of languages is not valid as evidence of the early Sultans being Indian. Not in the slightest.

    The theory that a nation in the Indian sub-continent once conquered our lands is actually old and is now being questioned by academics around the world. The current theory is that it was trade and migration that brought Hinduism to these parts.

    The story about the Chola dynasty ruling parts of Malaya has no basis of evidence as well. The prevailing theory is that Malaya was part of their trade route and their influence extended to our lands. This does not mean they ruled.

    The final point I have to make is that until the Brit arrived, India did not exist. India was made up of various nations within it’s sub-continent. People of various ethnicity, languages and religions lived there, as they still do today.

    The very idea that Indians are a race is as valid as Malays being a race.

    Whoever wrote the original article, is actually attempting to do what he/she is accusing the Malays of doing.

    • Ah now, this is indeed getting lively … lets please carry own ladies and gentlemen . . .
      I remember editing a paper claiming that an indigenous people who lived in lands near the present Thai-Malay border were in specific need of Malay help after 80,000 years of residence …. a remarkable claim . . .

    • U are so wrong. There are scriptures in India which states the conquest of Chola in Kedah. Its carved even in temples of how the Cholas ruled Malaya and the orang aslis were used as their servant. Many indians then had sex with the orang asli. Then came along Chinese traders and same thing another mixture with the orang asli+ indian + chinese = Malay. These are real facts but they cant accept it.

      • Indeed … I have read Chinese accounts saying they had no respect for Malays because the men pimped their wives for favors … despicable then, as now . . . and let us not review their history of piracy — which seems to continue as land pirates — surely they have lost their way and need the current humiliation as a correction …

      • Ok! It looks like I am defending Malays but I don’t give a hoot about them. Just hate it when nationalism gets in the way of history.

        ————————–

        There are several inscriptions that speak about Kedah found in the India in the 2nd and 3rd century.

        None of them mention an invasion but they do mention that Kedah was a peaceful “country”.

        There is also mention of sea raids that the Chola conducted against the Srivijaya kingdom. Pop historians like to call this an invasion.

        It is clearly not invasions because it was written that they did not leave behind their armies or administrative staff.

        Also at the time, Srivijaya was already a Hindu Kingdom. And being Hindu does not make them Indian.

        —————————-

        But that aside. This is my opinion.

        We see things from the perspective of today’s world. But if we think about it, there were no Indians, there was no Malays.

        There were just people living in the kingdoms and city states along the most ancient of sea trade routes.

        People from these civilizations visited each other regularly. They traded, exchanged ideas, traditions and innovations. And the people mingled and married each other.

        After hundreds to thousands of years, the people from these various kingdoms shared a lot in common. One could even argue that they were the same people.

        And those people living in the many kingdoms have more in common with each other than they do with us today.

        For us to be trying to define these ancient people using nationalism that only exist today, does them great injustice.

      • Absolute ! Cholas story was stated in Indian literate and carved in the temples. History must read from outside and not inside. I have read Malaysian professors theory but all of them are baseless and just to glorify one particular race ( Dr.Ranjit Singh Mali’s stated this )
        Their theories are not ” PEER REVIEWED “.
        The first kingdom of Greek were ruled by the Indians Pandiyan 1,Pandiyan 2 and Pandiyan 3 and it was documented in Greek history . They travelled extensively. Cholas invasion was also documented in SEA but only Malaysia dispute it.
        Hinduism started in Indus valley and spreaded to the rest of the world but now it seems Hindus civilaxation started in Malaysia based on some Malaysian professors.

      • Indeed … after ten years of experience in Malay academia I can say that genuine “peer review” is feared and status quo politically correct bias replaces truth orientation … so take up the pen of correction and do what Jordan Petersen is doing: make the re-orientations available online—open university format … t’ hell with the Malay mindset and institutions, they are sinking, being staved-in by their own arrogant ignorance.

    • To keep it simpler for you, then all of the names above are Tamils. Tamil is a race traced back 20000years so far. Many scholars around the world has agreed that Tamil is the mother of all language including Sanskrit. About Parameswara, often quoted as a Hindu. He is a Saivite & a Tamil. His name PARAMESWARA tells the story. Ask a Tamil what is the meaning of the name.

    • I can say you’re a fucking sucker..you’re a cheat.n liar..just like Jib..Accept the fact…The article is 100% true…well written..’Siapa makan cili dia rasa pedas’..Why..scared…you’re entitlement will be taken away…India never exist…before the British arrived…my balls…Why Christopher Columbus…called the tall red skinned guys…near the shores of Philadelpia in the 1457 ..when he was about to discover America…Black Indians or Belachan Indians…ah..ah..becoz they know only Indians were living east of the Atlantic and Pacific ocean…No one else…That’s why he called them ‘Red Indians’…read history correctly…you’re cultures all come from Tamil Indians…

      • Indeed …. trouble is that many are so ignorant and/or unconscious they do not realize they live a lie

      • I yoh yoh..Tamil naidu..bodirama also Tamil Macha…who took Buddhism to China n started Shaolin Temple..
        Vandkam

      • I yoh yoh..Tamil naidu..bodirama also Tamil Macha…who took Buddhism to China n started Shaolin Temple..
        Vandkam

    • hey idiot, show us the proof that the history is being questioned? Artifacts, Chronology, Carboy Dating has proved that Raja Raja chola was a great king and undisputed warrior who once ruled most of the nation. So, Pls stop your stupid Malay (fugitive) Maling bullshit.

    • U r an embicile and lack of research on the basic ground proves that u trying to protect ur Ketuaan Melayu.

    • Your reply is a total absurd.
      There are way too many evidence to support this. And its not just theories. For example, the Chinese history book, 5000 years of Chinese Maritime history clearly states how the Indian Kalinga Empire ruled places like todays Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Borneo including Brunei and Philippines. And to support this, you can find many places, cities, villages with their names such as Tanjung Keling, Kampung Keling and in North Philippines there is still a place known as Kalinga. This is way before the Chola Empire. This is the reason why Indians in this region is known as Keling and not the made up stories that British brought Indians in chains as convicts. That was Africans brought into US by the Spaniards. That is a mistaken identity fused by the tv serial Kunta Kinte. (Also has no relevance to Lembah Kinta, in Malaysia).
      The book also described how the Chinese Candu was used to drug Seri Maharaja and tricked him into converting into Islam by circumsizing him during the process. He later woke up and thought all happened in his dream and believed that it was a true calling.

      There are many more historical events in Indian history books that narrate incidents happened during the Chola’s ruling. So did the Singapore’s history book. The name Singapore was given by the grandson of Suriya Varman for Temasek. The actual name was Singa Puram which means Land of the Lion. The word Puram also means at the back which actually a pun because he saw the lion at the shore when he was going around the island from Johor. The site was located on the othet side of the island. The word Singapuram later became Singapura by the Malays and then became Singapore when the British came. Today the Indians accept the word Singapore as Singapur because the word Oor also means land or country.
      Many other historical events noted by the neighbouring countries explain the manner this land was ruled by the Indian kings not only by the Cholas but also Kalingas and Pallavas.
      The Malay word Pahlawan came from the Indian warrior king Pallavan and so did the name of the southern Philippines island, Palawan.
      These kings are not merchants and the merchanta do not have the authority to change the name of the place or histories never mentioned of such incidents.

      Please do not look into history from the views of 1 source only. Checknout historical references from other countries such as Indonesia and Thailand as well. Today both Thailand and Indonesia accepted this and embraced the idea well. This is the reason why they respect these religions because of their roles in making their countries as well as their race. Indonesia placed the picture of Lord Ganesha in their currency and acknowledged many historical temples that are unearthed even today. Thailand also did the same when they named their latest airport as Swarnabhoomi. Swarnabhoomi was the name given by the Chola for this entire region during their reign.

      • The Thais till today greet with their clasping hands. Similar to the Indians greetings of ‘Namaste’! This Namaste is also practiced in the Bali island of Indonesia.

      • Kerajaan Kalinga bukan di tamil nadu…

    • Eco, I guess you are a young man who has not read History of the 50’same and 60’see that we older generation were taught. Kindly read our old history books.

      Parameswara was said to be a Hindu prince. When he came to Malacca he and his group sat under an amalaka tree. That’s how it came to be called Malacca.

      Bujang valley and the recent excavations in Johor is proof that Indians were here in the early days , as mentioned by the olders above.

      All South East Asian countries don’t deny these facts. Why only here they are in denial.

      Truth will hurt the egoistic only. Great people admit the truth.

      The Education Ministry should take measures to correct back Malaysian history for the
      Sake of the future generations .

  15. Prior to talk on Chola Empayer, it wise to talk on period of Ramayana (chapter Jawodvipa) and Srimad Bhagavad Purana where by Children of descended of Prithu rule the entire world. Each and every word in Malayalam, Hindi Tamil came from Sanskrit language. Such is the case of South East Asian Language. Very agree Chola used to conquer part of Kedah and Sumetra. However, they were other India rulers from Maghada and Kalingha Empayer rule South East Asia about before Cholas which was reason why South East Asia had Bali, Majapahit and Sri Vijiya Empayer which was destroyed by the stupidly Chola Empayer, the reason why the declination of Hinduism in South East Asia.

    • Are you an idiot? Tamil language is the oldest language in the world. More older than sanskirt. Tamil language has retained its originality. It has no other language accent which is derived from Hindi and Sanskrit. Go read history before you give any unwanted comments.No matter what you try, you can manipulat the fact of history which has its solid evidence. Malayam? Lol!

      • Its true Tamil is the oldest language then followed by Sanskrit. But you don’t have to be so rash in your comments.
        The topic is not about which language came first but the history of the region was ruled by Indian kings.
        Peace!

  16. Majority Muslims in Malaysia especially Malay are too fanatical to be established into Islamic history not the religion perse. They want to destroy any facts links them their true lineage. We can see now some even trying the establish the Malay Muslim lineage to Nabi Muhammad SAW. Many converts also ship into this mentally for two reasons, one is to gain material benefits being associated as Bumiputera. The other reason is to wipe out their former Non Muslim. There are also converts genuinly forsake their identity especially the ones in mix marriage allowing spouses Muslim lineage to take lead and transformed to be Malay as constitution guarantees after certain conditions fulfilled. One has to remember history should not be twisted and the same history should not abused for personnal gain including promoting racism and religious bigotry. Everyone should treat humanity without any other barrier or biasness in preserving the Malaysian identity and Malaysia as a nation.

  17. Malaysia history have to be rewritten by especially NGO’s. Malaysia lama agovernment had manipulated the subject according to many teports like this one

    • Malays are hypocrites and liars … the entire culture is one of denial … what’s worse is they are ignorant, even at the highest levels! The Chinese had them pegged a thousand years ago and they haven’t changed … they still sew jingling bells into the phallus of consciousness … They will not recover from this exposition of their corruption and stupidity … However, they will commit the last crime against heaven and self by taking their politically correct foolishness to the street with the kriss … so get ready … they will be blood !

      • Just look at how YB Kula being attacked for saying that Indian history on this land goes back 2500 years.
        The Old and the New Malaysian government are still the same whennin comes to this topic. Its because both TDM and DSAI were in the UMNO bandwagon during the agenda took place. We need people like Rafizi Ramli to look beyond the race card to solve the Malaysian identity.

  18. There were 3 wages of immigrants: The Bujang Wave, the Malacca Wave and the Colonial Wave. The religion is not important. The big thing is that we in Malaya were running a civilisation here from 2,500/- years ago, from the Year 550BC by the Gregorian Calendar. At that time, the Britons were still living in the wild and eating their dead for food. It’s a strange conviction then that was spread about us living in trees when they “founded” us.

    • It was them who founded the locals living on the trees. It was the Indians. The tree houses are called as “Ran”. In East Coast, there were river houses known as “Rumah Rakit” which still existed till the late 70’s.

  19. The Truth and Nothing but the Truth. JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL.

    • Does it really matter now about who were the actual rulers of any country? Mind you that I’m a big fan of history.
      We can all go on and on about such history but no matter what is written about any race of a country or who were the actual rulers of a country, we will not be permanent residents of this world. Everyone eventually dies. King or the common man. Face it. Just live your lifes doing what is best for yourself and others.
      Be compassionate to all and strive to make this world a better place for all to live. Stop re-visiting history if nothing said or done can reverse it. Human beings will reject every truth even if its laid down right infront of them. Ignorance will dominate because thats the easiest thing to digest. Period!!

      • It does matter because truth is important and has everything to do with identity, reliability and trust, without which, what you propose is impossible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: